Petitioner failed to appear on successive dates; the High Court dismissed the criminal revision for non-prosecution.
Criminal Revision No.818 of 2016 dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.818 of 2016
=====================================
Vishal Singh @ Sonu
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Anr.
.... .... Opposite Party/s
=====================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the State : Ms. Reena Sinha, APP
=====================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
6 24-08-2018 There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on successive dates. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the matter.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
Praveen-II/-
U
Vishal Singh @ Sonu
The State of Bihar & Anr.
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
