In this oral order, the High Court at Patna held that a revision petition challenging an interim maintenance order granted by the Family Court, Katihar, is not maintainable. The petition was dismissed summarily as it lacked maintainability.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1197 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year- Thana- District- Katihar
======================================================
Devi Dayal Manishi, Son of Hari Prasad Bhagat, Resident of villageMahadevpur, P.S.- Pranpur (Roshna O.P.), District- Katihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. This is an application seeking revision of the order granting interim maintenance by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Katihar.
The present petitioner is not maintainable.
The petition is dismissed as being not maintainable.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
krishna/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a revision petition challenging an interim maintenance order is maintainable in the High Court.
Whether the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Katihar had jurisdiction to pass the impugned order.
Devi Dayal Manishi
The State of Bihar
Atiksha Devi
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
