Allowed

Meleshi Paswan @ Umesh Paswan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Feb 2018CR. MISC./8814/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order granting anticipatory bail to petitioners apprehending arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, regarding recovery of wine from their joint house. Bail was ordered subject to bonds and conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties within six weeks.

Meleshi Paswan @ Umesh Paswan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.8814 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2018 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Meleshi Paswan @ Umesh Paswan, Son of Late Ramotar Paswan,

¶5

Pradeep Paswan, Son of Maleshi Paswan, Both resident of Village- Shiv Nagar, Jamainiya, P.S.- Amas, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 21-02-2018

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

The prosecution case, in short, is that 10 liters wine is recovered.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The name of the petitioners has transpired as the alleged recovery has been made from the joint house of the petitioners, where other family members also reside. It is

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8814 of 2018(2) dt.21-02-2018 2/2

¶18

alleged that 10 liters wine is recovered from the joint house of the petitioners. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Amas P.S. case No.03 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶22

Narendra/-

¶23

U T

Meleshi Paswan @ Umesh Paswan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meleshi Paswan @ Umesh Paswan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Jahangir Vs The State Of Bihar

Krishna Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Amit Kumar @ Chhotu Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukhadev Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Godhan Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajeev Ranjan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.