The High Court of Patna granted the petitioner bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 385 and 387 of the IPC, allowing release on furnishing a bail bond with two sureties upon learning there was no direct allegation of ransom demand against him.
petitioner released on bail on bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties of equal amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.7599 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -94 Year- 2013 Thana -DUMRA District- SITAMARHI
====================================================== 1. Bikram Tiwary, S/o Mahabir Tiwary, resident of Village- Bhagwanpur Piprahi, P.S. Riga, District Sitamarhi.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh,APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
4 17-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 385 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code.
According to FIR, the ransom was demanded on mobile call from the referred mobile number. The said mobile is of co-accused Rakesh. It revealed during investigation that the petitioner is criminal associate of Rakesh.
Since there is no such allegation against the petitioner in the present case that he had demanded ransom and the petitioner is in custody since 30.11.2016, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7599 of 2018 (4) dt.17-04-2018
2
bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Dumra Police Station Case No.94 of 2013, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Nitesh/-
U T
Bikram Tiwary
The State of Bihar
BIRENDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
