Allowed

Sikkilal Sah @ Sikilal Sah and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC17 Dec 2018CR. MISC./75401/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to ten petitioners facing charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged obstruction, assault on a police officer, and hindrance to police administration. The court directed the petitioners to appear within six weeks in Vaishali.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties in connection with Lalganj P.S Case No. 289 of 2018.

Sikkilal Sah @ Sikilal Sah and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.75401 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2018 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sikkilal Sah @ Sikilal Sah son of late Sipahi Sah.

¶5

Naresh Sah son of Tunki Sah.

¶6

Manjay Sah son of Nand Lal Sah.

¶7

All resident of village- Kalesar, P.S.- Vaishali, District- Vaishali.

¶8

Ram Nath Sah son of Saryug Sah and

¶9

Sukhari Paswan son of Tilakdhari Paswan

¶10

Both resident of village- Pachpaika, P.S.-Vaishali (Belsar O.P.), DistrictVaishali.

¶11

Manoj Paswan son of Dhanesh Paswan

¶12

Sunil Paswan son of Kira Paswan

¶13

Baiju Paswan son of Jalim Paswan.

¶14

Sanoj Paswan son of late Badri Paswan.

¶15

Vishundeo Paswan son of Rajendra Paswan

¶16

All resident of village- Dilawarpur, P.S.- Lalganj, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶21

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Sri Murlidhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶22

2 17-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶23

The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Lalganj P.S Case No. 289 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 353, 427, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶24

The informant of this case happens to be Police Officer. It is alleged that these petitioners along with others obstructed trafficking by blocking National Highway. On

¶25

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75401 of 2018(2) dt.17-12-2018 2/3

¶26

interrogation, they raised protest and assaulted him.

¶27

It has been submitted that the full brother of petitioner no.3 was murdered for which a police case, vide Lalganj P.S. Case No.288 of 2018, was registered against one F.I.R. named person under sections 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code. Some of the villagers in order to protest the police inactiveness raised slogans. The petitioners being family members have been implicated in the present case. The allegation of causing hindrance to police administration is omnibus. The petitioners have clean antecedent.

¶28

Considering the nature of allegation, facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed and they, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali (Hajipur) in connection with Lalganj P.S Case No. 289 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of

¶29

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75401 of 2018(2) dt.17-12-2018 3/3

¶30

the concerned Court The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court.

¶31

(Sanjay Kumar, J)

¶32

mkchy/-

¶33

U T

Sikkilal Sah @ Sikilal Sah and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sikkilal Sah @ Sikilal Sah and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Awadhesh Dubey Vs Janardan Dubey

Surajuddin Mian @ Serajuddin and Ors. Vs Diljan Dhobi and Ors.

Dinesh Prasad Gupta and Ors. Vs Sunaina Devi and Ors.

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Keshari Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Alam Khan @ Alam Khan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Satyendra Bin and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar