Disposed

Satyendra Singh @ Satyendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC17 Dec 2018CR. MISC./74878/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner facing arrest threats in Sasaram Model P.S. Case No.893 of 2015 sought bail. Court observed that if petitioner appears within six weeks, the court shall consider his bail prayer while keeping in mind well-established principles that a person on bail shall not be denied such privilege unless misused.

What did the court decide?

Case disposed with direction to appear within six weeks for consideration of bail application. No immediate bail granted.

Satyendra Singh @ Satyendra Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.74878 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-893 Year-2015 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Satyendra Singh @ Satyendra Kumar Singh, S/o Rameshwar Prasad Singh @ Rameshwar Singh, R/o Village- Rupahtha, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Pandey ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 17-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶11

Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Sasaram Model P.S. Case No.893 of 2015 registered for the offences under Sections 448, 353, 384 and 504 of IPC.

¶12

The case has been registered on the basis of written report of District Agriculture Officer, Sasaram. As per F.I.R., this petitioner entered into the office of informant and asked for two trucks urea fertilizer and began to throw papers kept on table. When the co-ordinator intervened, he was also misbehaved by the petitioner. It appears that the anticipatory bail prayer was rejected vide order dated 04.05.2018 passed in A.B.P. No.817 of 2018. On perusal of said order, it appears that the petitioner in compliance of notice under Section 41(A) of

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.74878 of 2018(2) dt.17-12-2018 2/2

¶14

Cr.P.C. appeared before the police and he was released. It further appears that the police have submitted charge sheet. The learned court below has taken cognizance of offence and issued summons for appearance of the petitioner.

¶15

In view of above fact, this application stands disposed of with an observation that if the petitioner appears before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram/concerned court within six weeks from today, the concerned court shall consider his prayer for bail keeping in view the well established principle that a person who is already on bail shall not be denied such privilege unless there is any allegation of misuse etc.

¶16

(Sanjay Kumar, J)

¶17

Harish/-

¶18

Satyendra Singh @ Satyendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyendra Singh @ Satyendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Awadhesh Dubey Vs Janardan Dubey

Surajuddin Mian @ Serajuddin and Ors. Vs Diljan Dhobi and Ors.

Dinesh Prasad Gupta and Ors. Vs Sunaina Devi and Ors.

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Keshari Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Alam Khan @ Alam Khan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Satyendra Bin and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar