Allowed

Ravindra Pandit @ Raju and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 Dec 2018CR. MISC./73711/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge ordered bail for two petitioners in a Section 306 IPC case for aiding suicide, directing them to furnish a bond with sureties while finding they did not know the girl who committed suicide due to depression.

What did the court decide?

Directing petitioners to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties of the like amount each.

Ravindra Pandit @ Raju and Anr. Vs The State Of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.73711 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-427 Year-2017 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ravindra Pandit @ Raju, S/o Nanhak Pandit,

¶5

Pintu Kumar, S/o Ravindra Pandit @ Raju, Both Resident of Village- North Sanghat Kumhartoli, Post & P.S.-Phulwarisharif, District-Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anshuman For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajkishore Singh ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 12-12-2018

¶13

Heard both sides.

¶14

Petitioners seek bail in Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No.427 of 2017 registered under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The father of the victim alleged that Guddu Kumar, son of petitioner no.1 used to come to his house to impart tuition to his daughter but Guddu Kumar sexually exploited his daughter on the pretext of marriage but when Guddu Kumar refused to marry with his daughter, his daughter lodged a case in which Guddu Kumar went inside jail. It is further stated that when Guddu Kumar came out from the jail, these two petitioners used to hurl obscene and vulgar comment on account of which his daughter committed suicide.

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.73711 of 2018(2) dt.12-12-2018 2/2

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are father and brother of Guddu Kumar. They never came across with the girl. After death of the victim, the informant made allegations against the petitioners only because they happened to be the father and brother of Guddu Kumar. The girl herself committed suicide out of her depression.

¶18

Considering the facts aforesaid and nature of allegations made against the petitioners and the fact that the petitioners are father and brother of Guddu Kumar, petitioners, above named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJMcum-Sub-Juge-XV, Patna in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No.427 of 2017.

¶19

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶20

S.KUMAR/-

¶21

U T

Ravindra Pandit @ Raju and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra Pandit @ Raju and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arayan @ Aryan Kumar @ Ravi Raj @ Aryan Raj Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Madan Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Pappulal Sriwastawa @ Pappu Prasad Sriwastawa @ Pappu Sriwastawa @ Sangeet Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Mastan Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Mangal Sada Vs The State Of Bihar

Dev Karan Prasad and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar