Allowed

Murari Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC17 Feb 2018CR. MISC./7305/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Priya Prasad and Pramod Kumar in relation to PS Case No. 194 of 2017 alleging forgery and cheating under the IPC. Conditions for bail bond and attendance were impos.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of the like amount each subject to conditions of appearance and non-tampering.

Murari Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4834 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -194 Year- 2017 Thana -NARDIGANJ District- NAWADA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pramod Kumar, Son of Awad Ram, resident of Village- Nardidih Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat, Handia, P.S.- Nardiganj, District Nawada.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

with

¶11

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7305 of 2018

¶12

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -194 Year- 2017 Thana -NARDIGANJ District- NAWADA

¶13

====================================================== 1. Murari Prasad, Son of Late Bishundhari Singh, Resident of VillageIsmailpur, Police Station- Sirdala, District- Nawada. At present Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Handiya, Police Station- Nardiganj, DistrictNawada.

¶14

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶15

Versus

¶16

The State of Bihar.

¶17

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶18

====================================================== Appearance : (In Cr.Misc. No.4834 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anish Chandra, APP (In Cr.Misc. No.7305 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP

¶19

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶20

3 17-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 194 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 406,409,420,467,468,471/34 of the IPC.

¶21

In the written report, it is alleged that these petitioners

¶22

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4834 of 2018 (3) dt.17-02-2018

¶23

2/3

¶24

being Panchayat Secretary and Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Hadiya, illegally withdrew the amount under Mukhya Mantri Nischay Yojna. It is further alleged that on the direction of Estimate Committee of Block, the amount was to be transferred to the account of Ward Executive Committee and on recommendation of Ward Executive Committee, the money was to be withdrawn, but the same was not done by these petitioners.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the aforesaid guidelines for the Panchayat of the Government was challenged in CWJC No. 19591 of 2016 with analogous cases and this Hon’ble Court vide judgment dated 17.05.2017, enclosed as Annexure-4 to this petition, quashed the aforesaid instruction of the Government for carrying out the work on recommendation of Ward Executive Committee. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that in the written report, there is no allegation of defalcation of amount against the petitioners. There is only allegation that without transferring the amount first to Ward Vikas Samiti, the money has been directly withdrawn by this petitioner. The supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioners. The counsel for petitioners has submitted that measurement book has been issued after completion of all the work.

¶26

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners, named above, in the

¶27

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4834 of 2018 (3) dt.17-02-2018

¶28

3/3

¶29

event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 194 of 2017 to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateVI, Nawada subject to condition as laid down u/S 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. with further conditions (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bonds of the petitioners and (3) if the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

¶30

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶31

khushbu/-

¶32

U T

Murari Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murari Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shoheb Akhtar @ Soyeb Akhatar Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandan Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhuwar Yadav @ Bhuar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Das Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Pramod Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar