Allowed

Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Mar 2018CR. MISC./7192/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 392 IPC, the Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner. He relied on the parity of his co-accusee, whom the same Court had earlier admitted to bail.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Ram Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.7192 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2017 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Ram S/o Kamal Ram, R/o Village- Bhelwa, P.s. & District- Madhepura ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party

¶6

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. YOGENDRA KUMAR SINGH(APP) ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 27-03-2018

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶11

learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶12

This is a petition for grant of regular bail

¶13

in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 206 of 2017 for offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The first information report is against unknown.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks bail of the petitioner on the ground of parity as similarly situated one of the co-accused, Amit Yadav, has been admitted to bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 2826 of 2018.

¶16

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 206 of 2017 to the

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7192 of 2018(3) dt.27-03-2018 2/2

¶18

satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura , on the conditions that one of the bailors must be close family member of the petitioners and secondly, the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the trial Court and in case of absence on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the trial Court.

¶19

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶20

Shamshad/-

¶21

U T

Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Ram @ Hira Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Chintu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Bittu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Mantu Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Kumar @ Ram Kumar Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar