Partly allowed

Mohan Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC18 Dec 2018CR. MISC./71053/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismissed a bail application for the first petitioner as infructuous due to his recent arrest. It granted anticipatory bail to the second petitioner, permitting release upon surrender within four weeks if arrested, subject to a bond and conditions.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as infructuous for Petitioner 1. Petitioner 2 released on bail in event of arrest/surrender within 4 weeks on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Mohan Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.71053 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2018 Thana- BAKHTIARPUR District- Saharsa

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mohan Yadav Son of Ramotar Yadav

¶5

Anandi Yadav Son of Late Bhumi Yadav Both Resident of Village-Belwara,Tola Matkhora,P.S. Bakhtiyarpur (O.P. Kanariya),Distt.-Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar -2, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 18-12-2018

¶10

Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶11

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with Bakhtiarpur P.S. Case No. 65 of 2018 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 328, 324, 307, 427, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the application petitioner no. 1, Mohan Yadav has been arrested and as such the application on his behalf has become infructuous.

¶13

The application is dismissed as infructuous on behalf of petitioner no. 1.

¶14

So far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned, learned

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.71053 of 2018(2) dt.18-12-2018 2/2

¶16

counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no criminal antecedent and there is no overt act alleged against him.

¶17

Considering the fact that the petitioner no. 2 has no criminal antecedent and there is absolutely no allegation of assault against him and the fact fact similarly circumstanced coaccused Dhanoj Yadav and others have been granted anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 35232 of 2018 vide order dated 28.6.2018, let the petitioner No.2, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Bakhtiarpur P.S. Case No. 65 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.

¶18

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶19

spandey/-

¶20

U T

Mohan Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohan Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kin Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Dhanamuni Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Gopal Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Prem Shankar Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Baiju Pandey @ Baiju Kumar Pandey and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bimal Kumar @ Bimal Sah Vs The State Of Bihar