Allowed

Gyanand Mandal v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC17 Dec 2018CR. MISC./70735/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences of abducting and trafficking a minor, considering the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents and the primary accusation against co-accused.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail for a period of 12 weeks, subject to executing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Gyanand Mandal Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.70735 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2018 Thana- CHHATAPUR District- Supaul

¶3

====================================================== Gyanand Mandal, Son of Late Rameshwar Mandal, Resident of Village+ P.S.Chhatapur, District- Supaul.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

Ramchandra Sharma, Son of Late Jagarnath Sharma, Resident of VillageLaxmipur, Ward No. 5, P.S.- Chhatapur, District- Supaul.

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Ansarul Haque ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 17-12-2018

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120B/34, 364, 366A, 372 and 373 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

The prosecution case got initiated on the filing of a complaint case and is to the effect that the informant allowed her daughter Gulsan Kumari to work as a private domestic helper in the house of Uma Kumari. On 15.10.2017 when the informant came to the house of Uma Kumari to meet his daughter, she was not found there. When the informant made protest, he was abused and threatened by the accused persons including the petitioner and was informed that his daughter was sold at the hands of some residents of U.P.

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.70735 of 2018(2) dt.17-12-2018 2/2

¶19

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the thrust of accusation is against Uma Devi. A statement has been made in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedent.

¶20

It is submitted by learned APP for the State that the petitioner is also named in the FIR.

¶21

Considering the thrust of accusation against coaccused, Uma Devi, coupled with statement made in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedent, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-IV, Supaul in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No. 120 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶23

Ashwini/-

¶24

U T

Gyanand Mandal v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gyanand Mandal v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumit Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Pankaj Mochi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Dhandai Devi @ Dhandei Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Dr. Ashutosh Kumar @ Ashutosh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shyam Narayan Singh @ Shyam Kishore Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar