Allowed

Raju Kumar Sha v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC6 Dec 2018CR. MISC./70116/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted the petitioner provisional anticipatory bail for four months in a complaint case involving offences under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, contingent on the restoration of matrimonial harmony.

What did the court decide?

Provisional anticipatory bail for four months granted upon furnishing bail bonds and satisfying specific conditions regarding matrimonial harmony.

Raju Kumar Sha Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.70116 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2018 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raju Kumar Sah, S/o Surendra Prasad Sah @ Surendra Sah, R/o VillageLauriya Mishra Tola, P.S.- Lauriya, District- West Champaran.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Surabhi Kumari, W/o Raj Kumar Sah D/o Vinod Kumar, R/o VillageLauriya Mishra Tola, P.S.- Lauriya, District- West Champaran at Present Chanpatiya Ward NO. 7, P.S.- Chanpatiya, District- West Champaran.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Madhuri Lata ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 06-12-2018

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶16

counsel for the complainant and learned APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioner, being the husband of the complainant , is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case, wherein process has been directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶18

The prosecution case, as per the complaint petition, is that the marriage between the complainant and the petitioner was performed on 04.12.2015 but subsequently, for nonfulfillment of further dowry demand, torture was inflicted on her by the petitioner and other in-laws family members.

¶19

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

¶20

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.70116 of 2018(2) dt.06-12-2018 2/3

¶21

that the petitioner admits his marriage with the complainant and is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour, statement to that effect has been made in paragraph 11 of the petition, which reads as follows:-

¶22

“That the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant and similar was his stand even before the court below.”

¶23

It is further submitted that similar was the stand of the petitioner before the learned Court below which gets reflected from the impugned order. The petitioner has also filed Matrimonial Suit No. 817 of 2018 for restitution of conjugal rights which is pending before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bettiah, West Champaran and the complainant has also filed Maintenance Case No. 16M of 2018 with a prayer of maintenance before the same Court.

¶24

Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the complainant is ready to accept the offer of the petitioner. However, the complainant apprehends that the offer of the petitioner is not bonafide and the petitioner is making this offer in order to obtain bail from this Court.

¶25

However, both sides agree to appear before the learned Court below on 15^th of January, 2019 when the petitioner will take the complainant to her matrimonial house to

¶26

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.70116 of 2018(2) dt.06-12-2018 3/3

¶27

keep her as wife with full dignity and honour.

¶28

Considering the present stand of the parties, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail for four months in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Complaint Case No. 28C of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶29

The provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by the learned Court below in three eventualities (I) if the matrimonial harmony is substantially restored, or (ii) if the complainant fails to appear before the learned Court below, or (iii) if the complainant gets reluctant to reconcile the issue.

¶30

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶31

DKS/-

¶32

U T

Raju Kumar Sha v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Kumar Sha v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munna @ Munna Kumar @ Munna Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjiv Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Shankar Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Kameshwar Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar

Vinod Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Dipawali Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar