Allowed

Deepak Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Nov 2018CR. MISC./69843/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to Deepak Kumar Singh in a prosecution under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, directing his appearance before the Excise Judge within six weeks subject to bond conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and appearing before the Special Judge, Excise within six weeks.

Deepak Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.69843 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-213 Year-2018 Thana- SAHAR District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Deepak Kumar Singh, Son of Ram Sakal Singh, resident of Village Karnaul, Near Primary School, P.S.- Charpokhri, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh 1 ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 27-11-2018

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a)/38 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

The prosecution case, in short, is that 124.200 liters wine is recovered.

¶15

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as the alleged car in question belongs to the petitioner. Same is run as taxi by the driver of the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.69843 of 2018(2) dt.27-11-2018 2/2

¶17

petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 124.200 liters wine is recovered from the car in question. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

¶18

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 4^th Additional and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Sahar P.S. case No.213 of 2018 corresponding Excise case No.1496 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Narendra/-

¶22

U T

Deepak Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manju Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Sharwan Chaupal and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bablu Sau @ Bablu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Nandan Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Kalpana Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Yasin Ansari @ Yasin Mian and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar