Allowed

Md. Kamre Alam @ Kamre Alam v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC14 Dec 2018CR. MISC./68223/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna entertained an application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner faced charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, alleging mob action. The Court observed the petitioner had no antecedents and was only accused of being a mob member. Consequently, the application for anticipatory bail was allowed subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Allowed anticipatory bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Md. Kamre Alam @ Kamre Alam Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.68223 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2016 Thana- BHEJA District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Kamre Alam @ Kamre Alam Son of Md. Rahullah@ Rahullah Resident of Village- Mahapatiya, Police Station- Bheja, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 14-12-2018 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 54 of 2016 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Referring to the FIR he submits that the petitioner is only a member of mob. After investigation the police submitted final form and thereafter on complain before the DIG direction was issued for further investigation under Section 73(8) Cr.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the informant submits that after submission of the final form a complaint was made to the

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68223 of 2018(2) dt.14-12-2018 2/2

¶16

DIG and thereafter direction was issued for further investigation in terms of Section 73(8) Cr.P.C. and after investigation materials have come against the petitioner.

¶17

Considering the fact that in the FIR the role attributed to the petitioner is only that he was a member of mob and no other overt act, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate III, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 54 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.

¶18

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶19

spandey/-

¶20

U T

Md. Kamre Alam @ Kamre Alam v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Kamre Alam @ Kamre Alam v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikky Kumar @ Vikky Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhedi Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Gyani Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Kapildeo Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar

Abdul Rahman @ Abdul Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Nath Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar