Allowed

Jai Prakash Jha v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC7 Dec 2018CR. MISC./67595/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case alleging execution of a sale deed by fraud. The petitioner, the complainant's brother, was accused of offences under the IPC. The High Court allowed bail on furnishing of bonds and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner allowed anticipatory bail to be released upon arrest/surrender, on furnishing bail bonds and two sureties.

Jai Prakash Jha Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.67595 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1120 Year-2016 Thana- NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jai Prakash Jha Son of Late Kartik Jha Resident of Village-Kadirganj, P.S. Nawada (Kadirganj O.P.), Distt.-Nawada

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 07-12-2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

¶13

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1120 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The complainant claims that the petitioner and other accused got executed sale deed dated 15.6.2007 in respect of lands of complainant by playing fraud upon her and when she came to know about the aforesaid fact, she filed the present complaint case in the year 2016 that is after nine years. The petitioner happens to be the full-brother of the complainant and has been shown as witness on the aforesaid sale deed.

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67595 of 2018(2) dt.07-12-2018 2/2

¶17

Therefore, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that petitioner, in the event of his arrest/ surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the court concerned, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in Complaint Case No. 1120 of 2016 subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶18

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶19

Spd/-

¶20

U T

Jai Prakash Jha v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jai Prakash Jha v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyam Babu Yadav @ Bablu Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Amrul Hoda Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunit Kumar @ Sunit Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Kapil Gope and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bind Kumar Kamat @ Bind Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Mahesh Bind Vs The State Of Bihar