Allowed

Upendra Chaudhan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC22 Nov 2018CR. MISC./67472/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a criminal case involving assault and attempt to charge under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379 and 34 IPC. Bail was ordered subject to surrender within six weeks and furnishing sureties, under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to surrender within six weeks and furnishing security.

Upendra Chaudhan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.67472 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2018 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Upendra Chaudhan Son of Lalji Chauhan

¶5

Mukesh Chauhan Son of Lalji Chauhan Both are Resident of Village-Bhaunour Beldari P.S. Narhat,Distt.-Nawada

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Kumar Singh 1 ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 22-11-2018

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The prosecution case, in short, is that while the bhagina of informant was coming to his house on motorcycle, the accused persons, variously armed, assaulted him due to which he sustained injury.

¶17

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67472 of 2018(2) dt.22-11-2018 2/2

¶19

present case. There is a case and counter case between the parties. The nature of injury is said to be simple. Hence, no offence under Section 307 IPC is made out.

¶20

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. V, Nawada in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 153/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶22

Pankaj/-

¶23

U T

¶24

(Sudhir Singh, J)

Upendra Chaudhan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Upendra Chaudhan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandan Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Hari Sah and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Jahangir Ansar @ Md. Jahangir Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar

Birendra Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Randhir Kumar Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar