Allowed

Deepak Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC1 Nov 2018CR. MISC./66819/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving IPC Sections 323, 379, 498A, and Dowry Prohibition Act, subject to conditions including surrender within six weeks and furnishing of bail bonds.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail if he surrenders within six weeks, furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of similar amount before the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrat

Deepak Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.66819 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -531 Year- 2017 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS)

¶3

====================================================== Deepak Kumar, S/o Ram Ayodhya Choudhary, resident of villageRamgarh, P.S. Natwar, District-Rohtas.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 01-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶6

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 379, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶7

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

¶8

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs.

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66819 of 2018 (2) dt.01-11-2018

¶10

Page 2 of 2

¶11

The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

¶12

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶13

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Complaint Case No. 531 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶14

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶15

A.K.V./-

¶16

U T

Deepak Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamrul Nesha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Lalit Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Yadav Jee Vs The State Of Bihar

Praksah Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Bipin Kumar @ Bipin Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Nandlal Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar