Allowed

Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC29 Oct 2018CR. MISC./65508/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous matter dealt with an application for anticipatory bail filed by a petitioner apprehending arrest in a dowry harassment and criminal trial case. Relying on a prior judgment, the single-judge bench granted anticipatory bail for a period of six weeks conditioned upon surrender and furnishing of bail bonds with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted for six weeks upon surrender and furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Manish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.65508 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -129 Year- 2018 Thana -MADHUBANI TOWN DistrictMADHUBANI

¶3

====================================================== Manish Kumar, S/o Vijay Prasad, Resident of Mohalla-Akharaghat, Gola Bandh Road, P.S. Town, District-Muzaffarpur.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Pandey

¶5

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 29-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶7

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 420, 307, 323, 341, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶8

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

¶9

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. There is no medical examination report in support of the offence u/S 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Rest of the offences are triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65508 of 2018 (2) dt.29-10-2018

¶11

Page 2 of 2

¶12

upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

¶13

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶14

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 129 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶15

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶16

A.K.V./-

¶17

U T

Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Janaki Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Arjun Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Arjun Prasad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Aayas and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Suresh Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Rai Vs The State Of Bihar