Single-judge order rejecting the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail. The Bench found the specific allegations against the petitioner unacceptable for granting bail. Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.64329 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-262 Year-2018 Thana- BARARI District- Katihar
======================================================
Ravi Sah Son of late Dinesh Sah Resident of Village-Semapur,P.S. Barari Distt.-Katihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyendra Prasad ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
2 06-12-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
Informant was enticed away by the petitioner to a secluded place where petitioner tossed with her as well as also tried to commit rape. Furthermore, there also happens to be detailed description of subsequent event resulting delay in institution of the case.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that both the parties are close Gotia. The relationship in between the informant and the petitioner happens to be that of cousin brother and sister. The dispute arose with regard to parking of motorcycle as well as opening of a window. It has further been submitted that parents of the informant projected her and got this case filed with false and frivolous allegation.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64329 of 2018(2) dt.06-12-2018 2/2
The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the
prayer.
Allegation so attributed did not justify the prayer for
anticipatory bail. Consequent thereupon the same is rejected.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)
Prakash Narayan U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail against allegations of rape and attempted rape.
Ravi Sah
The State of Bihar
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
