Partly allowed

Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kumar Singh and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC30 Nov 2018CR. MISC./63219/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court refused anticipatory bail to one petitioner who had three identical cases, but granted bail to the other two petitioners with ₹20,000 bail bonds, subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to Petitioners 1 and 3 on bond of Rs. 20,000 each with sureties, subject to surrender within 30 days; bail refused to Petitioner 2.

Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of… — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.63219 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-251 Year-2018 Thana- MASHRAK District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kumar Singh son of Banke Singh.

¶5

Dhamendra Singh, son of Banke Singh.

¶6

Saheb Kumar, son of Hare Ram Singh. All are Resident of Village- Dih Chapia, P.S. Taraiya, District Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Alok Kumar Sinha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 30-11-2018

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners

¶14

and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467,468,471 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30,30(a),38 and 41 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

From the referred vehicle, liquor was allegedly recovered from the road side. Petitioners were not there. Name of the petitioners surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused.

¶17

Considering the facts that petitioner No.2Dhamendra Singh has got three more identical cases, I am not inclined to enlarge him on anticipatory bail.

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63219 of 2018(2) dt.30-11-2018 2/2

¶19

Prayer is refused.

¶20

Other petitioners, namely, Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kumar Singh and Saheb Kumar have got no criminal antecedent as well as considering the aforesaid material, let the petitioners No.1 and 3, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000 (Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Masrakh P.S.Case No. 251 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further the petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.

¶21

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶22

Nitesh/-

¶23

U T

Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kumar Singh and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kumar Singh and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamal Sah and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Gorakh Choudhary and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Mahto @ Sanjay Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sikandar Khan @ Shikandar Khan Vs The State Of Bihar

Dilip Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Pintu Kumar @ Pintu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar