Justice Aditya Kumar Trivedi dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition as infructuous after finding that a charge had already been framed in the underlying case, noting the order was an oral decision based on a lower court report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6171 of 2016 (03) dt.26-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6171 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -115 Year- 2015 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha-Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta-A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
03 26-10-2018 Seen the report submitted by the learned lower Court
wherefrom it is evident that charge has already been framed.
That being so, instant petition has become infructuous and is accordingly, dismissed.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
Vikash/-
U T
Upendra Kumar
The State of Bihar
Jaidev Rajak
ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
