The court dismissed the petitioner's criminal miscellaneous petition as infructuous on the ground that the requisite charge had already been framed in the underlying case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6141 of 2016 (2) dt.05-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6141 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -4 Year- 2013 Thana -SIRDALA District- NAWADA
====================================================== 1. Navin Singh Son of Kameshwar Singh Resident of village - Mahabatpur, P.S. Sirdalla, District - Nawada
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Ravindra Paswan Son of Balchan Gahlaut Resident of village - Paranpura, P.S. Sirdalla, District - Nawada
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arjun Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. B.N.Panday(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
2 05-10-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that charge has already been framed. In the aforesaid background instant petition has become infructuous and is accordingly, dismissed.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)
Prakash Narayan U T
Navin Singh
The State of Bihar
Ravindra Paswan
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
