Dismissed

Azad Sah @ Azad Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 Feb 2018CR. MISC./6030/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a dowry death case ( secs. 304(B)/34 IPC). The court rejected the bail prayer given the death of the victim in a dowry case, allowing surrender to secure further relief from the lower court.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Petitioner must surrender within four weeks for reconsideration by the lower court.

Azad Sah @ Azad Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6030 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2017 Thana -MATIHANI District- BEGUSARAI

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Azad Sah @ Azad Kumar, S/o-Ram Jivan Sah Resident of VillageChakbali Diara, P.S.-Matihani, Dist.-Begusarai.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 12-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in Matihani P.S. Case No. 12 of 2017 instituted for the offences under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The victim has died due to un-natural death led to dowry case. The petitioner is husband having stated that during that period he was living in Banglore.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that case has been lodged under wrong impression and he has wrongly been

¶16

dragged in the present case. He has further submitted that other persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court

¶17

but status of the present petitioner is as that of husband.

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6030 of 2018 (3) dt.12-02-2018

¶19

¶20

In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the court below within a period of four weeks, the court below will pass an order on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order passed by this Court. The court below will decide the case taking notice that other persons have been granted anticipatory bail.

¶21

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶22

Vinay/-

¶23

U T

Azad Sah @ Azad Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Azad Sah @ Azad Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kumar Dharmendra Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Dukhan Mahto Vs the Food Corporation of INDIAand

Bibi Naheda Begam Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Mohan Sahni Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Rabindra Mohan Prasad Vs the Central Bank of India and or

Kamla Tiwary Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.