Punita Devi v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court modified an order dated 29.08.2018 in a bail cancellation matter to correct clerical errors where the word 'petitioner' was used incorrectly and a date was mentioned wrongly. The court displaced the correct terms in view of the submissions.
What did the court decide?
The word 'petitioner' was read as 'Opposite Party No.2' and the date '22.01.2017' was read as '22.11.2017' in the October 29, 2018 order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.58897 of 2018
In
Criminal Miscellaneous No.11437 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- 159 Year-2016 Thana- Mahila District- Bhojpur
======================================================
Punita Devi W/o Rajesh Kumar Roy, R/o Vill.- Balbandh, P.S.- Charpokhari, District- Bhojpur at Ara.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
- The State of Bihar.
- Rajesh Kumar Roy @ Rajesh Roy S/o Rajendra Roy, R/o Vill./MohallaSamahairiya, P.S.- Agnoar, District- Arwal. At present R/o Rourkela, Ved Vyash Chowk, Durga Mandap Gali, P.S.- Brahmni Tarang, DistrictSundergarh, Odisha.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 29.08.2018 in Cr. Misc. No. 11437 of 2018 should be modified to correct clerical errors regarding the naming of the opposite party and the date of a bail application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Punita Devi
- respondent
The State of Bihar
- respondent
Rajesh Kumar Roy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court