Petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a cheating case involving Flip Kart customers. The Court dismissed the application, noting the crime's prevalence and lack of recovery from petitioners.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 58196 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-255 Year-2018 Thana- GIRIYAK District- Nalanda
... ... Petitioner/s Versus ... ... Opposite Party/s
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 13-12-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58196 of 2018 dt.13-12-2018 2/2
from them. Learned counsel further submitted that no person has complained of being cheated through the persons alleged to be involved in the crime. It was further submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
P. Kumar
| AFR/NAFR U T |
|---|
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail in an offence under Sections 419/420/467/468/471 IPC and Section 66 IT Act.
Binod Manjhi
Bhola Manjhi
Guddu Chaudhary
Babloo Malakar
The State of Bihar
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
