The Patna High Court refused to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner facing charges of cheque dishonour and cheating. The court rejected the defence suggesting collusion and found the application lacking sufficient grounds for bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 57936 of 2018
Arising Out of Complaint Case No.-1910 Year-2016 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- Patna
======================================================
Ravindra Rai @ Ravindra Ray, Son of Sri Sone Lal Rai, resident of C/o Satya Narain Singh, House No. 63, Kautilya Nagar Near Vetinary College, P.S.Shastri Nagar, Town & District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 10-12-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the complainant (Opposite Party No. 2), who had appeared suo motu.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57936 of 2018 dt.10-12-2018 2/3
threatened and, thus, finally legal notice was sent on 26.05.2016, but inspite of that, the petitioner is alleged not to have given the money.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57936 of 2018 dt.10-12-2018 3/3
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
Anand Kr.
AFR/NAFR U T
1 issue framed by the court
whether the petitioner is entitled to be granted anticipatory bail in a complaint filed under Sections 138 of the N.I. Act and 420 of the IPC.
Ravindra Rai @ Ravindra Ray
The State of Bihar
Surendra Prasad
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
