Allowed

Arjun Mahto @ Arjun Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Sept 2018CR. MISC./57396/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under sections 302 and 34 of the IPC, the Patna High Court granted bail. The court observed that the impugned order did not show any other material against the petitioner. Bail was granted subject to furnishing a bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount.

Arjun Mahto @ Arjun Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.57396 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -17 Year- 2013 Thana -NAWADA District- NAWADA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Arjun Mahto @ Arjun Prasad, S/o Late Parmeshwar Mahto, R/o Vill.Bhandari, P.S.- Kawakole, District- Nawada.

¶4

The State of Bihar

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶6

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh

¶7

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 20-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶9

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

The FIR was lodged on recovery of the dead body of the wife of the younger brother of this petitioner. Petitioner is under suspicion that he has committed the murder for dispute relating to land.

¶11

The impugned order which was passed after perusal of the case diary, does not show that any other material was there against the petitioner.

¶12

Hence, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57396 of 2018 (2) dt.20-09-2018

¶14

2/2

¶15

Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Nawada Town (Kadirganj O.P.) Police Station Case No. 17 of 2013, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner as well as condition that both the bailors shall be resident of within the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

¶16

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶17

Kundan/-

¶18

U T

Arjun Mahto @ Arjun Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arjun Mahto @ Arjun Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Beena Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhabila Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Nitesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Deepak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Jha Vs The State Of Bihar