Allowed

Aehmad @ Ahamead @ Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC25 Apr 2018CR. MISC./5595/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court granted bail to a petitioner in custody for offences under IPC Sections 363 and 366(A) by framing a bond of Rs.10,000 with sureties and imposing specific conditions for release.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount each, subject to conditions including presence of a close relative bailor and non-commitment of further offences.

Aehmad @ Ahamead @ Ahmad Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5595 of 2018 (2) dt.25-04-2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5595 of 2018

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -38 Year- 2017 Thana -JOGBANI District- ARARIA

¶4

====================================================== Aehmad @ Ahamead @ Ahmad Son of Late Mazarum @ Md. Majlum, Resident of Village-Purana Tola, P.S.-Sadar, District-Purnea.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

.... .... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 25-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶13

The petitioner, who is in custody since 01.04.2017, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 358 of 2017 arising out of Jogbani P.S. Case No. 38 of 2017 for the offence alleged under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code having earlier been rejected by this Court by order dated 13.07.2017 in Cr. Misc. No. 31802 of 2017.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in a subsequent development charges have now been framed on 23.03.2018 (Annexure-6 of the supplementary affidavit).

¶15

Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the period of custody already suffered since 01.04.2017, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 3^rd Additional Sessions Judge, Araria, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 358 of 2017 arising

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5595 of 2018 (2) dt.25-04-2018

¶17

out of Jogbani P.S. Case No. 38 of 2017, on the following conditions:-

¶18

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶19

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶20

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶21

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶22

Md. Ibrarul/BT

¶23

U T

Aehmad @ Ahamead @ Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aehmad @ Ahamead @ Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nirmala Devi Vs The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited and Ors.

Shri Sanjay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Gopal Agrawal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Balram Prasad Yadav @ Balram Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Suman Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through Secretary Building Construction Department Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Ram Kumar Singh Vs Bihar State Financial Corporation and Ors.