Allowed

Umesh Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Sept 2018CR. MISC./54558/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioners accused of offenses relating to unnatural offenses, attempt to murder, and illegal manufacturing of liquor. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioners on bail upon furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of the like amount.

Umesh Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.54558 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-235 Year-2017 Thana-

¶3

RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan

¶4

=======================================

¶5

Umesh Yadav, S/o Sri Bachcha Yadav,

¶6

Shankar Yadav S/o Umesh Yadav, Both R/o Vill.Rajpur, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ======================================= Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Kumar Singh 1 ======================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 04-09-2018 The petitioners seek bail in connection with

¶12

Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 235 of 2017 dated

¶13

26.12.2017, instituted for the offences under Sections 272, 273, 308 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30/38 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been named by the villagers alleging that they had run away from the place

¶15

where local liquor was being manufactured. It has not

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54558 of 2018(2) dt.04-09-2018 2/2

¶17

been stated in the F.I.R as to which villagers named the petitioners. It has, therefore been submitted that the implication of the petitioners is only on the basis of some stray disclosure made by the villagers.

¶18

The petitioners are in custody since 03.07.2018

¶19

and they were made accused in one other case of similar nature apart from the present case.

¶20

Regard being had to the period of custody of

¶21

the petitioners above named, they are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2^nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Siwan in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 235 of 2017.

¶22

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶23

Shageer/-

¶24

U T

Umesh Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umesh Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shashi Shekhar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Pramod Mahto Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rakesh Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Lal Babu Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Paras Mani @ Ghatak @ Ghatak Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar