The Patna High Court disposed of an oral petition where the petitioner was identified from the confession of a co-accused. The court found the case fit for the lower court's consideration due to the co-accused's lack of criminal antecedents.
The instant petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53302 of 2018 (2) dt.08-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.53302 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -106 Year- 2018 Thana -BHAGALPUR GRP CASE District-
BHAGALPUR
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anita Kumari Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
learned APP.
Name of the petitioner transpires on the basis of inculpatory extra judicial confessional statement of co-accused having no criminal antecedent whereupon, happens to be a fit case for consideration of learned lower court.
With the aforesaid observation, instant petition is
disposed of.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
perwez
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the instant petition should be disposed of based on the transpiring name of the petitioner from an inculpatory confession.
Whether the case is a fit case for consideration by the lower court given the co-accused's lack of criminal antecedents.
Moti Sah
The State of Bihar
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
