Allowed

Domi Sah @ Domi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Sept 2018CR. MISC./52954/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner for the offences alleged under Sections 448, 323, 307 and 504/34 of the IPC. The release was conditioned on his arrest or surrender within six weeks and compliance with specific orders.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions including arrest/surrender within six weeks.

Domi Sah @ Domi Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.52954 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -323 Year- 2017 Thana -TRIVENIGANJ District- SUPAUL

¶3

====================================================== Domi Sah @ Domi Kumar, son of Hiro Sah, Resident of village - Garhia, P.S.- Tribeniganj, District- Supaul.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

.... .... Opposite Party

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party: Mr. Rajendra Pd. Nat, APP

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 20-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶11

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 448, 323, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Tribeniganj P.S. Case No. 323 of 2017.

¶12

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as there is case and counter case between the parties in the backdrop of land dispute. The allegation of assault by spade (Kudal) on the head and finger of the informant is not supported from the injury report. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

¶13

Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner’s arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52954 of 2018 (2) dt.20-09-2018

¶15

2/2

¶16

thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, Supaul, in connection with Tribeniganj P.S. Case No. 323 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions -

¶17

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶18

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶19

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶20

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶21

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶22

B.T/-

¶23

U T

Domi Sah @ Domi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Domi Sah @ Domi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramdarsan Rai and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Kashi Nath Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

The Bihar State Electricity Board and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Manoj Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Kitab Mian @ Kitabuddin Sayee @ Kitabuddin and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Nazeer @ Nago Vs The State Of Bihar