Allowed

Sukhdeo Yadav and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC17 Sept 2018CR. MISC./52779/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed anticipatory bail to the petitioners who are apprehending arrest in a murder case. The court granted bail on the condition that they surrender within six weeks, furnished specific bonds, and comply with statutory conditions of the relevant section.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail within six weeks of future arrest upon furnishing sureties and paying set bail bonds amount of Rs.10,000 and similar surety bonds.

Sukhdeo Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.52779 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2018 Thana- SHEIKHOPUR SARAI DistrictSheikhpura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sukhdeo Yadav, S/o Late Ghuran Yadav,

¶5

Sarita Devi W/o Sukhdeo Yadav,

¶6

Pujan Yadav @ Pujan Kumar, S/o Sukhdeo Yadav, All R/o Vill.Rahicha, P.S.- Shekhopursarai, District- Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Sahin Begam ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 17-09-2018

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶15

APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

The prosecution case, in short, is that the accused perons including the petitioners committed murder of younger sister of the informant due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry and disposed of her dead body with an intention to conceal the evidence.

¶18

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no

¶19

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52779 of 2018(2) dt.17-09-2018 2/2

¶20

allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners are father-in-law, mother-in-law and brother-in-law of the deceased. They are separate in mess and property from the husband of the deceased. They have no concern with the alleged occurrence. There is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence nor there is any other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in the present case.

¶21

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 1^st , Sheikhpura in connection with Sheikhopur Sarai P.S. case No.35 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶23

Narendra/-

¶24

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶25

U T

Sukhdeo Yadav and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukhdeo Yadav and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harendra Singh @ Harendra Prasad @ Jalim Vs The State Of Bihar

Gautam Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Pramod Paswan @ Babloo Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Shankar Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Bablu Tiwari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shobha Devi Vs The State Of Bihar