Petitioner sought withdrawal of Criminal Miscellaneous application stating that having been arrested, the application had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.50734 of 2018
====================================================== Uday Singh @ Uday Shankar Singh S/o Late Chandar Singh @ Late Ramchandra Singh, resident of Village- Lakhipur Koli, Police StationGaurichak, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jay Ram Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajeev Nayan
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER
2 05-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already been arrested, hence, this application has become infructuous and seeks permission to withdraw.
This application is permitted to be withdrawn as it has become infructuous.
(Nilu Agrawal, J)
Devendra/Priyanka
U T
Uday Singh @ Uday Shankar Singh
The State of Bihar
Nilu Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
