Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous application to frame a charge under Section 239 CrPC instead. The High Court granted leave and disposed of the withdrawn application.
Leave to withdraw the present application was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46823 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -252 Year- 2013 Thana -BEUR District- PATNA
======================================================
Sushila Devi wife of Late Shivnath @ Nanki at present resident of Harishchandra Sipara, P.S.- Beur, District - Patna
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gyanendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 20-02-2018 After some arguments, Mr. Gyanendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present application in order to raise all the points available to the petitioner at the stage of framing of charge by filing an application under Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Leave is granted.
The application is disposed of.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Md.S./-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous application is permissible to file an application under Section 239 CrPC at the stage of framing charge.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sushila Devi
The State of Bihar
Sushma Devi
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
