In bail application u/s 302 IPC, the High Court allowed petitioners to be enlarged on bail of Rs.25,000 each with two sureties citing death of informant's father and injuries on postmortem.
Enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.25,000 each with two sureties of like amount subject to specified conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46804 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -202 Year- 2017 Thana -EKANGARSARAI District- NALANDA
(BIHARSHARIFF)
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
2 19-09-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Ekangarsarai P.S.case no.202 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 302, 147, 148, 149, 120(B) ----- of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioners and other accused persons
is of causing death of the father of the informant.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the FIR itself shows that six persons were seen fleeing away and thereafter the dead body was found and the postmortem report shows only two injuries over the person of the deceased. Moreover, the petitioner no.1 is in custody 28.11.2017 and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46804 of 2018 (2) dt.19-09-2018
2/2
petitioner nos. 2 and 3 since 21.2.2018.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with ekangarsarai P.S.Case nO.202 of 2017.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)
chn/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are eligible for regular bail in the instant case.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sachin Kumar @ Sachin Prasad and others
The State of Bihar
Vinod Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
