The High Court at Patna rejected an oral bail petition by the petitioner, who was accused of possessing 190 grams of Charas under Sections 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act, 1985.
The prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46387 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -52 Year- 2016 Thana -JIRADEI District- SIWAN
====================================================== Shanish Kumar @ Chhote Son of Janak Sah, R/o Mohalla- Dakhin Tola Siwan , P.S.- Siwan Town, District- Siwan.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Bhushan Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
4 03-01-2018 The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jiradei P.S. Case No. 52 of 2016 (Trial No. 87/16) instituted for the offences under Sections 20 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
The petitioner was found to be in possession of 190 grams of Charas .
For the nature of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is accordingly rejected.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
Shageer/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in a case involving Section 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act, 1985.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shanish Kumar @ Chhote
The State of Bihar
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
