Dismissed

Braj Kishore Singh @ Brij Kishore Singh @ Bijan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Aug 2018CR. MISC./45030/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court rejected an application for regular bail filed by the petitioner in a case involving rape and other serious charges. The court held that positive evidence existed and the victim reiterated allegations in her judicial statement, precluding bail.

What did the court decide?

Application for regular bail rejected. Trial of the case ordered to be expedited.

Braj Kishore Singh @ Brij Kishore Singh @ Bijan… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45030 of 2018 (3) dt.20-08-2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45030 of 2018

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -246 Year- 2018 Thana -KUDHNI District- MUZAFFARPUR

¶4

====================================================== Braj Kishore Singh @ Brij Kishore Singh @ Bijan Singh, Son of Late Ananda Singh, resident of Village- Dhatiya Thatiya, P.S.- Kurhani, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jagdhar Prasad

¶8

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 20-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶10

The petitioner is in custody since 31.05.2018 in connection with Kurhani P.S. Case No. 246 of 2018 for the offence registered under Sections 354(B), 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

The allegation against the petitioner is that he committed rape upon the girl and it was only on cries being raised by her that she was saved from the petitioner.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire story is false and fabricated and the petitioner may be extended the privilege of bail.

¶13

Learned counsel for the State, after perusal of the case

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45030 of 2018 (3) dt.20-08-2018

¶15

diary submits that there is positive evidence against the petitioner of committing offence under the POCSO Act, and he should not be extended the privilege of bail, as the victim girl in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. reiterated, as stated in the first information report.

¶16

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to granted regular bail to the petitioner. It is, accordingly, rejected.

¶17

Let the trial of the case be expedited.

¶18

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶19

Jagdish/-

¶20

U T

Braj Kishore Singh @ Brij Kishore Singh @ Bijan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Braj Kishore Singh @ Brij Kishore Singh @ Bijan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjeet Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Prince Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Kalin Kumar @ Ram Kalin Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Niraj Kumar @ Neeraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Shambhu Sah Vs The State Of Bihar