Allowed

Pintu Kumar @ Bithal @ Bithal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 Aug 2018CR. MISC./43862/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, a non-antecedent accused in a police station case involving burglary and theft, furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, noting allegations of false implication due to a dispute with the police.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to A.C.J.M., 7, Gaya.

Pintu Kumar @ Bithal @ Bithal Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Property and Title | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43862 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -103 Year- 2018 Thana -DELHA District- GAYA

¶3

====================================================== PINTU KUMAR @ BITHAL @ BITHAL YADAV Son of Ramesh Kumar Yadav Resident of Mohalla - Banda Bigha, Police Station - Delha, District - Gaya.

¶4

1. The State of Bihar.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶6

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar No.- 4 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Sumiran Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 01-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶8

The petitioner is in custody since 27.04.2018 in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 103 of 2018 for the offence registered under Sections 454 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

The allegation against the petitioner is that he had broken into the house of one Ram Lakhan Prasad on 20.04.2018 and escaped and thereafter, on 22.04.2018 he had again tried to break open the house of one Prem Kumar upon which the local people caught hold of the petitioner and assaulted him badly, as a result of which, he was to be referred to hospital.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only because there was some dispute between the Thana In-charge of

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43862 of 2018 (2) dt.01-08-2018

¶12

2/2

¶13

the area and the present petitioner, he has been falsely implicated in the case and he was badly assaulted and has been languishing in jail. It is further submitted that no one has seen him breaking into the house of the persons as mentioned in the first information report.

¶14

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M.,- 7, Gaya in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 103 of 2018.

¶15

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶16

Jagdish/-

¶17

U T

Pintu Kumar @ Bithal @ Bithal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pintu Kumar @ Bithal @ Bithal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabhat Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar

Dinesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Jagdish Yadav @ Jagdish Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Shambhu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar