The Patna High Court ordered the dismissal of an anticipatory bail application as it was voluntarily withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel. No substantive legal issues were addressed in the brief order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43796 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -79 Year- 2009 Thana -VIGILANCE District- PATNA
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mohammed Abu Haidar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, L.O., I/c.,Vigilance ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER
2/ 23-07-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application filed in connection with Special Case No.33 of 2009 arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No.79 of 2009 pending in the Court of the Special Judge, Vigilance-I, Patna.
In view of such, application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Sanjay Priya, J)
JA/-
Rohit Kr.
U T
Bishwanath Chaudhary
The State of Bihar
Sanjay Priya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
