Allowed

Punit @ Punit Singh and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC30 Jul 2018CR. MISC./42213/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted bail to three petitioners in a criminal case involving communal rioting. The court directed the petitioners to execute bonds with sureties, remain present at trials, and cooperate with investigation.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to conditions regarding antecedents, presence, and cooperation with investigation.

Punit @ Punit Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42213 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Punit @ Punit Singh,

¶4

Navneet @ Navneet Singh Both Sons of Birbahadur Singh,

¶5

Bimlesh Singh @ Bhuti S/o Rajnarayan Singh, All R/o Vill.- Kaparpura, P.S.- Hathua, District- Gopalganj.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumari Rashmi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mustaque Alam ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 30-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the

¶10

informant is also present.

¶11

The petitioners have been in custody since 09.04.2018 in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 15 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147/148/ 149/323/324/ 325/371/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there

¶13

is case and counter case between the parties and the injuries have been found to be inflicted on both the sides. It is further submitted that so far as these three petitioners are concerned, save and except the Punit Singh, who was having one antecedent in the past, the other two petitioners are not having any criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that these petitioners shall abide by the terms and

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42213 of 2018 (2) dt.30-07-2018

¶15

2/3

¶16

conditions of this Court and shall not indulge further in any such act.

¶17

In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances and that and petitioners are close agnates and there has been a land dispute for which a suit is pending which has led to this occurrence, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-14, Gopalganj, in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 15 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:-

¶18

(1) One of the bailors will be their own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or their wife.

¶19

(2) The petitioners shall not indulge themselves in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶20

(3) The petitioners shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

¶21

(4) The petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure,

¶22

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42213 of 2018 (2) dt.30-07-2018

¶23

3/3

¶24

the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of

¶25

bail.

¶26

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶27

Saif/-

¶28

U T

Punit @ Punit Singh and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Punit @ Punit Singh and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jai Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Chitranjan Vishwakarma Vs The State Of Bihar

Anil Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sri Kishun Paswan @ Kishun Ram and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Prince Kumar @ Priyans Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sushma Sinha Vs Bihar State Financial Corporation and Ors.