Dismissed

Chiranjivi Sagar @ Chranjivi Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC8 Aug 2018CR. MISC./41765/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail petition related to charges of murder and arms offense, the High Court rejected the plea. Despite prior directions for speedy trial, the court held the petitioner as the main assailant and refused bail, yet directed the trial court to proceed on day-to-day basis.

What did the court decide?

Bail prayer rejected; direction to trial court to conclude trial as early as possible on day-to-day basis.

Chiranjivi Sagar @ Chranjivi Bhagat Vs The State… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41765 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -195 Year- 2012 Thana -RUNISAIDPUR District- SITAMARHI

¶3

====================================================== Chiranjivi Sagar @ Chranjivi Bhagat, S/o Late Bindeshwar Bhagat, Resident of Village- Hajpurva @ Hajipur Basant, P.S.- Runni Saidpur, District- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 08-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶9

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶10

Earlier the bail prayer of the petitioner was thrice rejected by this court and while rejecting the bail prayer of the petitioner on 18.10.2017 in Cr. Misc. No. 49316 of 2017, this court directed the trial court to conclude the trial of the petitioner as early as possible even by taking the trial of the petitioner on day to day basis.

¶11

However, it is informed on behalf of the petitioner

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41765 of 2018 (3) dt.08-08-2018

¶13

2/2

¶14

that up till now only three prosecution witnesses could be examined and there is no possibility of conclusion of trial of the petitioner in near future.

¶15

Petitioner happens to be main assailant and there is allegation against him that he shot fire on the deceased. Therefore, again I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 151/14 + 586/14 arising out of Runni Saidpur P.S. Case No. 195 of 2012 pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sitamarhi stands rejected.

¶16

However, the trial court is further directed to proceed with the trial of the petitioner on day to day basis and take all possible steps so that the trial of the petitioner could be disposed of as early as possible.

¶17

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶18

SHAHZAD/-

¶19

U T

Chiranjivi Sagar @ Chranjivi Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chiranjivi Sagar @ Chranjivi Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amar Prasad and Anr. Vs Mahadeo Prasad Yadav @ Mahadeo

Md. Rashid @ Pappu Vs The State Of Bihar

Vicky Kumar @ Vicky Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Saryug Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Rashid @ Pappu Vs The State Of Bihar

Dhurendra Prasad Jaiswal Vs Bishwanath Prasad and Ors.