This court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in Connection with Forest Case No.24 of 2018, subject to conditions including presence in court and non-tampering with evidence.
Anticipatory bail granted upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and complying with specified conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41617 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 2018 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictBHABHUA (KAIMUR)
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Fahimuddin, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER
2/ 18-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Forest Case No.24 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 33 and 64 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that he was not apprehended on the spot. The name of the petitioner has been disclosed by co-accused, Rintu Kumar, who was apprehended. There is no recovery of any article from the possession of the petitioner.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Forest Case No.24 of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41617 of 2018 (2) dt.18-07-2018
2/2
2018 , he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J)
JA/Rohit Kr. U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a forest offence case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mahendra Morya @ Mahendra Maurya
The State of Bihar
Sanjay Priya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
