Single judge order granting regular bail to the petitioner in a kidnapping case under Section 364 IPC, subject to furnishing a bond and specific conditions.
The petitioner is enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties each to the satisfaction of ACJM, Sherghati.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41101 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -17 Year- 2018 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA
====================================================== 1. Sandeep Kumar Yadav son of Shiv Kumar Yadav, resident of VillageNawadih Panari, P.S. Hunterganj, District- Chatra (Jharkhand).
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S. Jamil Akhtar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Harendra Prasad
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
3 25-09-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sherghati P.S.Case nO.17/18 registered for offences punishable under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping of the husband of the informant and though he is not named in the FIR and later on his name transpired during the course of investigation of the case.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner and he is in custody since 12.3.2018 another co-accused having similar allegation has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 13.4.2018 passed in Cr.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41101 of 2018 (3) dt.25-09-2018
2/2
Misc. No.20142 of 2018. The petitioner has not been identified by the victim as recorded in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C.
Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that at his instance, the motorcycle of the abducted person has been recovered.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM, Sherghati, Dsitrict Gaya in connection with Sherghati P.S.Case No.17 of 2018 .
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)
chn/U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in connection with alleged kidnapping under Section 364 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sandeep Kumar Yadav
State of Bihar
Vinod Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
