Allowed

Braj Nandan Prasad @ Brij Nandan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC16 Jul 2018CR. MISC./40773/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Karza P.S. Case No. 69 of 2018, allowing his surrender within six weeks on security and sureties, subject to conditions regarding cooperation and Witness tampering.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail allowed subject to conditions including surrender within six weeks, security deposit of Rs. 10,000, and two sureties of the like amount each.

Braj Nandan Prasad @ Brij Nandan Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40773 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -69 Year- 2018 Thana -KARJA District- MUZAFFARPUR

¶3

====================================================== Braj Nandan Prasad @ Brij Nandan Prasad, S/o Ramyash Mahto, R/o Vill.Panapur Akhtiyarpur, P.S.- Karza, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K, Advocate. For the informant : Mr. Praveen Prabhakar, Advocate. Mr. Sanjay Kr. Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Anita Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶4

2 16-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and the State.

¶5

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Karza P.S. Case No. 69 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 307, 353, 427 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the written report there is specific allegation against co-accused Bharat Kumar of assaulting the informant with iron rod, causing injury to him. There is general and omnibus allegation against he petitioner.

¶7

Learned counsel for the informant has appeared and opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40773 of 2018 (2) dt.16-07-2018

¶9

2/2

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Karza P.S. Case No. 69 of 2018 , he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 2^nd (West), Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶11

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶12

S.Ali/Rohit Kr.

¶13

U T

Braj Nandan Prasad @ Brij Nandan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Braj Nandan Prasad @ Brij Nandan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sitapati Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Amrendra Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Pankaj Yadav @ Pankaj Kumar Yadav Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Manoj Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Bechu Mehta @ Bachhu Mehta Vs The State Of Bihar

Dr Iqubal Khan @ Md. Eqbal Khan Vs The State Of Bihar