Dismissed

Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Sept 2018CR. MISC./39303/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a second bail petition in the Patna High Court. Considering the seriousness of charges and petitioner’s criminal antecedent which warranted earlier denial, the court dismissed the prayer. It observed the trial court should proceed expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail was dismissed without revising the earlier order, with a direction to the Trial Court for expeditious trial.

Kishore Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 39303 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-802 Year-2015 Thana- Khagaria District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Kishore Singh S/o Late Surya Narayan Singh, R/o Vill.- Kharigi Tirasi, P.S.Khagaria (Gangour), District- Khagaria.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Mr. Paras Nath ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

2. 19-09-2018

¶10

Heard Sri Mritunjay Kumar, learned counsel for the

¶11

petitioner, Sri Arun Kumar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor as well as Sri Paras Nath, learned counsel for the informant.

¶12

This is the 2^nd attempt for grant of bail. Earlier, on 20-11-2017, the prayer for bail of the petitioner rejected, vide Cr. Misc. No. 55415 of 2017, considering the fact that there was accusation against the petitioner that he fired in the occurrence as well as the fact that petitioner was having criminal antecedent.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the fact that case has already been committed to the court of sessions, no progress has taken place.

¶14

Considering the fact that in view of seriousness of the

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39303 of 2018(2) dt.19-09-2018 2/2

¶16

accusation and antecedent of the petitioner, earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected, there is no reason to review my earlier order. However, while dismissing the petition for bail, it is desirable to observe that learned Trial Court may proceed with the case expeditiously so that the trial may come to its logical end without unnecessary delay.

¶17

With above observation, the prayer for bail stands dismissed.

¶18

(Rakesh Kumar, J.)

¶19

anay

¶20

U T

Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Reshama Pravin Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bipin Paswan @ Bipin Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Anita Devi @ Anita Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar

Kishori Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Akhilesh Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramesh Kumar Raman Vs Union Of India Through The C. B. I.