Allowed

Urmila Devi and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC2 Jul 2018CR. MISC./38171/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On an application for anticipatory bail in a PC Section 304B / 34 case, the Patna High Court allowed the prayer. The petitioners may appear to surrender within six weeks to be released on producing a bail bond and sureties under SC 438 CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to surrender within six weeks and furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.

Urmila Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38171 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2018 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Urmila Devi, W/o Bhuneshwar Paswan,

¶5

Ranju Devi, W/o Ram Babu Paswan, Both residents of VillageAshopur, Anantpur, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 02-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

¶12

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Naubatpur P.S. case no. 80 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The petitioners are mother-in-law and sister-in-law (gotani) of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. It is further submitted that husband of the deceased is already in custody.

¶14

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Naubatpur P.S. case no. 80 of

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38171 of 2018(2) dt.02-07-2018 2/2

¶16

2018, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M.-II, Danapur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

¶17

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶18

shyambihari/-

¶19

U T

Urmila Devi and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Urmila Devi and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Kumar Barnawal Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramanand Ray and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Nirbhay Tiwari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jamirul Haque @ Izamirul Haque Vs The State Of Bihar

Banshidhar Sharma and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Mithu Yadav @ Mithlesh Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar