Allowed

Akhilesh Kumar @ Akhilesh Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC5 Jul 2018CR. MISC./37979/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the Patna High Court enlarged the petitioner accused under IPC Sections 386 and 392 on bail upon furnishing a bond with conditions, addressing arguments regarding innocence and lack of charge-sheet allegations. (46 words)

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each; one surety must be a close relative with sufficient immovable properties.

Akhilesh Kumar @ Akhilesh Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37979 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2018 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Akhilesh Kumar @ Akhilesh Choudhary, Son of Darbari Choudhary, Resident of Village- Mosma, P.S.- Warsaliganj, District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 05-07-2018

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 28.04.2018 in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 229 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 386 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The prosecution case, as lodged by the informant, is that he is working as godown keeper in H.P. Gas station and doing accounting work in his office. There were five vendors and thereafter two persons came and approached for gas connection and went away to another person who was standing near the gate. Thereafter they returned and on pistol point snatched Rs.6,000/- from the drawer of the office and also threatenend him to give rangdari of Rs.2 Lakhs and snatched

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37979 of 2018(2) dt.05-07-2018 2/3

¶15

away the mobile of the informant.

¶16

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, not named in the First Information Report, bears no criminal history and his name surfaced only on the confessional statement of a co-accused, Sabir, who has since been granted the privilege of bail. He submits that just because an old unworkable mobile was found in his room, he has been made accused in the present case. He submits that no Test Identification Parade has been done so far and that the petitioner is a student and the room is being shared by two students. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no allegation of tampering with the prosecution witnesses by the petitioner.

¶17

However, learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let the petitioner, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 229 of 2018, subject to the condition that one of the bailors would be close relative of

¶19

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37979 of 2018(2) dt.05-07-2018 3/3

¶20

the petitioner having sufficient immovable properties, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioner.

¶21

(Nilu Agrawal, J.)

¶22

Arjun/Ragini

¶23

U T

Akhilesh Kumar @ Akhilesh Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akhilesh Kumar @ Akhilesh Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Piyush Kant @ Rohit Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Choubey @ Vijay Kumar Choubey Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Hussain Vs The State Of Bihar

Ganesh Prasad @ Ganesh Prasad Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Suraj Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhir Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar