This oral order dismissed a criminal miscellaneous application as infructuous because the Sessions Trial had concluded with the acquittal of the petitioner arising out of the victim PS case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37815 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -217 Year- 2017 Thana -BAGHA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH)
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arjun Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER
6 19-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now Sessions Trial No. 81 of 2018 arising out of Bagaha (Bhairoganj) P.S. Case No. 217 of 2017 has been concluded and the petitioner has been acquitted. Hence, he submits that this application has become infructuous.
Considering the said facts, this application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Nilu Agrawal, J)
Devendra/Priyanka
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether, after the petitioner's acquittal in the Sessions Trial, the criminal miscellaneous application for bail or analogous relief has become infructuous and should be dismissed.
Sharma Sahani @ Sharma Sahni
The State of Bihar
Nilu Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
