Allowed

Lal @ Lalba @ Lalua @ Mustaquim @ Muskim @ Mastakim v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Jan 2018CR. MISC./3779/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a theft case where the stolen vehicle was not recovered from his possession despite his criminal antecedents, subjecting him to strict attendance conditions.

What did the court decide?

Directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two family sureties. Petitioner must remain physically present during trial; bond liable to cancellation for two consecutive a

Lal @ Lalba @ Lalua @ Mustaquim @ Muskim @ Mastakim Vs The… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3779 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -230 Year- 2017 Thana -BIRPUR District- SUPAUL

¶3

====================================================== Lal @ Lalba @ Lalua @ Mustaquim @ Muskim @ Mastakim S/o Md. Mokim , R/o Village- Lalpur Goth, P.S.- Birpur, District- Supaul.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Ashlam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 19-01-2018 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

¶7

The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection

¶8

with Birpur (Balua Bazar) P.S.Case No. 230 of 2017 registered under Section 379 of Indian penal Code.

¶9

Allegation in brief is that motorcycle of the informant was stolen away by some unknown persons.

¶10

It is submitted that motorcycle was not recovered from the possession of the petitioner rather it was recovered from a deserted place and the police has submitted charge sheet in this case.

¶11

Learned counsel for the State submits that petitioner has criminal antecedent of similar nature.

¶12

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances as the recovery is not from his possession, the petitioner, namely, Lal @ Lalba @ Lalua @ Mustaquim @ Muskim @ Mastakim is

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3779 of 2018 (2) dt.19-01-2018

¶14

2/2

¶15

directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Birpur, Supaul in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 230 of 2017, with condition that one of the bailor must be his close family relative. Petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without any medical emergency, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶16

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶17

Sujit/-

¶18

Lal @ Lalba @ Lalua @ Mustaquim @ Muskim @ Mastakim v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lal @ Lalba @ Lalua @ Mustaquim @ Muskim @ Mastakim v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vivek Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Rehan @ Gulam Ali Vs The State Of Bihar

Laljee Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Krishna Kumar @ Chhotu @ Chotu Vs The State Of Bihar

Doman Ansari @ Iftekhar Mobin and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Gurucharan Chauhan @ Lambu Vs The State Of Bihar