Allowed

Mustaque Ansari and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jul 2018CR. MISC./37565/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted anticipatory and regular bail to two petitioners in a Preliminary Inquiry Case under Section 30(k) and 37(g) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and appearing within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 each and two sureties of like amount, to appear within six weeks.

Mustaque Ansari and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37565 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2018 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. Mustaque Ansari, son of Late Ishu Ansari, Resident of Mohalla - Ward No. 2, P.S. - Nokha, District - Rohtas.

¶5

Manoj Kumar Rai alias Manoj Singh, son of Naresh Rai R/o Mohalla - Kurm Tola, Ward No. 5, P.S. - Nokha, Distt - Rohtas.

¶6

... ... Petitioners

¶7

Versus The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudama Singh, Adv. Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 25-07-2018

¶9

Heard Sri Sudama Singh, learned counsel , assisted by Sri Surendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

¶10

Two petitioners, apprehending their arrest in Nokha P.S. Case No.47 of 2018 registered for the offence under Sections 30(k), 37(g) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act,2016, have prayed for grant of bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, has drawn my attention to the statement made in paragraph-3 of the petition to show that petitioner no.1 is having clean antecedent. So far as petitioner no.2 is concerned, it was argued that after the petitioner was falsely made accused in the present

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37565 of 2018(3) dt.25-07-2018 2/2

¶13

case, he was made accused in Nokha P.S. Case No.125 of 2018, in which he has already been granted bail subsequently. It has been argued that both petitioners have been arrayed as accused only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, whereas from conscisous possession of petitioners, nothing was recovered.

¶14

Considering the nature of accusation as well as the fact that petitioners have been arrayed as accused on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, let both the petitioners, namely, (i) Mustaque Ansari (ii) Manoj Kumar Rai @ Manoj Singh, in the event of their arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2^nd Addl. District and Sessions Judge-cum- Excise, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No.47 of 2018, subject to conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶15

(Rakesh Kumar, J.)

¶16

nawalkrs/-

¶17

U T

Mustaque Ansari and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mustaque Ansari and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Karu Raj Vanshi Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajnish Prasad @ Badmas Vs The State Of Bihar

Sachchidanand Rai @ Sachchidanand Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Kanhaiya Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar